I could complain and kvetch all day
about Rahm Emanuel. I try to avoid this
as I don’t think it is good for my well-being.
The latest closing of almost 50 schools while making a multi-million
dollar deal to build a stadium for DePaul, a private Catholic university,
really has me twitching. (The last I
read, it is a $173 million dollars.) I
start ranting then say “Cancel” to myself.
Usually this ends my tirades.
This issue, however, keeps resurfacing in my psyche so maybe if I vent
it will become a simmer rather than a full-boil.
I studied the list of school
closings. I’m not sure if it is the
“official” list or something the Chicago Tribune compiled. I hope it was the “official” list. If the Tribune created it, they should be
slapped. It is difficult to follow as
both the closing schools and the receiving schools are on it. In typical CPS fashion, schools are referred
to by their last name but listed alphabetically by the first name. An example I picked randomly is Ignance
Paderewski Elementary Learning Academy.
That is how it is listed alphabetically in the “school” column but
referred to as Paderewski everywhere else.
Question one: Who the h-e-double hockey sticks taught these
people to alphabetize? Consistency
matters! Any librarian worth her salt
would be having a seizure with this list.
I’m having a seizure with this list and I’m not even a librarian.
I know nothing about Paderewski
school. I looked it up on the map and I
found it on Lawndale and Cermak. From
the list, it is a Level 3 school which is the lowest of three levels. Paderewski was on probation and about 62% of
its children meet or exceed the Illinois Standardized Achievement Test (ISAT) scores. That is worrisome, of course.
So, I dig further. Almost 80% of the students are African
American. The remainder of children are Hispanic. 93% received free or reduced
price lunches. There are 172 children at
this school and there is room, by the idiotic CPS standards of 30 children in a
classroom, for 570. (CPS determines
capacity by multiplying the number of classrooms by 30. This includes Libraries, Special Education
classrooms, Art rooms, or anything big enough to be called a classroom as a
classroom although it is used for the whole school.) Even if you say 22 kids in a class, which is
what I call “The Lee-Ann Standard,” an amount I believe is reasonable, the
school would only be half full. It must
be echoing from the emptiness. I have to
believe the neighborhood has changed tremendously in the last 50 years for it
to have become so under populated.
Questions two and three: How many of these kids have
families who are supportive to their lives?
How many have moved in the last year?
I ask these questions sincerely.
I’m not making assumptions. I
know better. I do know that some schools
have huge turnover. I do know that an
unstable home life affects learning and, consequentially test scores.
The list goes on to say the students
will be sent to Cardenas and Castellanos schools. I am mentally slapping the chart maker again
while I search for the first names of these schools. Lazaro Cardenas School, where some of the
students are going, is 98% Latino. The
school, by CPS standard is 84% at capacity.
By the Lee-Ann Standard, it is bursting at the seams. But get this, Cardenas has a Level 1
performance ranking but only 65% meet or exceed the test.
Question five: How can only 65% of your kids be meeting or
exceeding the “test” and you have a Level 1 rating? How does that work? (I
know those are really two questions but
rhetorical questions don’t count.)
“Castellanos” is Rosario Castellanos
Elementary School. It is at 91% CPS capacity
which is way crowded by the Lee-Ann Standard.
Again, it is nearly all Latino students.
Get this though: 64% of its
students meet or exceed standards which make it …..get ready for it …. a Level
2 school. Huh?
Confused? Me, too!
I wonder how they figure out the levels.
I looked on the CPS website and was baffled by how it is
determined.
On a map, these three schools are
pretty close together. That doesn’t mean
much in a large city. Gang lines are
gang lines. After living in Chicago for
over 35 years, I have watched neighborhoods become gang war zones. I suspect, although I’m not positive, this may
be a factor with these schools.
And that is just one of 49 schools
being closed.
What worries me most is we are
cramming the students from Paderewski into schools that are pretty full. The schools and teachers will be measured by
how successful they are at, shall we say, teaching to the test. So if we go by the new numbers in these
schools class size will be about 32 or 33 kids per classroom.
I have heard from many baby boomers
about the size of the classes we had when we were kids. Yes, they were huge. My first grade class had 52 kids. We had three reading groups, the Jesus, the
Mary and the Joseph groups. (That’s a
different story.) I’m not sure how we
learned to read. The goal in those days
was for us to finish high school, and maybe go to college if you were so
inclined.
Today’s teachers have a different
world. We are judged on our students’
AYP, or in non-educator speak, annual yearly progress. Your students test scores should rise by one
grade level each year. Less actual
learning occurs and more teaching to the test takes place. In fact, one year CPS was saying 34 students
in a classroom was okay. Vent
alert: 34 in high school, 34 in fifth
grade, 34 in first grade. First grade! When
they are learning to read! Cancel!
Children who are suspected of having
learning differences have to be elaborately monitored. One year,
I had twelve, count them, twelve children being monitoring for learning
problems. This means that they were at
risk of failing due to the inability to do second grade level work. Oh, the person who did the monitoring was none
other than me, the classroom teacher.
Monitoring requires weekly individual diagnostic testing. It also meant I had to give them daily small
group attention completing scientifically proven activities to increase their
learning. It means making a graph with
little dots showing their progress. What
it mostly means is time away from the rest of the class who I have given brief
instructions on how to complete valuable and authentic work on their own
without my help. Oops! I’m venting
again. Cancel!
I loved all my students and wanted
everyone to get the help they deserved, but with a group that requires that
much over-the-top monitoring, I felt my secure students never got the attention
they needed and deserved. We spend hours
documenting learning and behavior issues.
I doubt Sister Hugo, my first grade teacher, ever had to do this for one
or two of her 52 students.
The point here is: to be successful in a classroom today takes
more than teaching from a text book with children sitting in rows. It takes creativity, knowledge of your
community, and diligence. There is no
way around it. To make children want to
learn, there needs to be more than test practice. The more children in a classroom, the thinner
the teacher’s time is spread. Three or
four children do make a difference. Maybe
22 children in a class is pie in the sky but as an average class size, I think
it makes higher test scores and genuine learning attainable.
How will the former Paderewski
students fare in their new schools?
I wonder where the
support structures are for a group of children moving from one learning community
into another. I don’t see these built
into this school closings transition. What
is built in is the promise of air conditioning (which I would have happily
killed for on a hot June day.) There is
the promise of a plan to help children move across gang dividing lines on the
way to school. There is a promise of iPads
for each student. I wish I felt better
about CPS promises.
Questions six, seven and eight: Who supports the child’s well being during
this transition? What supports are the
teachers getting to help these children not only academically succeed but help
become part of the school community? What
about moving children into a school in another gang’s school? (Shudder, I can’t even phantom the problems
this could cause in a classroom in seventh or eighth grade.)
I don’t envy the people who had to
look at these problems and make decisions about it. Obviously, some changes needed to be
made. Some of the physical plants of
these schools have been neglected for decades and community populations have
moved on to new neighborhoods. Abrupt change
to the schools, however, doesn’t seem to be the best route. A gradual change would have been better in my
mind. Obviously, the city has resources
it is spending on DePaul’s stadium. Obviously, the unanimous vote by Rahm’s
appointed school board to close 48 schools in one vote was not well researched.
Perhaps it was the alphabetizing issue that confused them.
Questions nine and ten: Why did all the closings have to be at once
and this year? Was each school
researched by the board half as much as what I did?
My heart goes out to the teachers,
parents and most especially to the children who have to make this move. The children are the true victims of
this. Change happens in life and not all
change is bad. Change without choice
often needs support and I don’t see a promise or even a plan for that. It seems a change that is doomed to failure.
rahm emanuel school closing c cps